Reducto vs Pulse | Agentic Document Platform Comparison

Reducto leads independent benchmark on structured extraction with Deep Extract

Helping everyone from startups to Fortune 10 enterprises unlock their data.

Dimension Reducto Pulse
Category Full platform: parse, extract, split, classify, and edit in one API. Focused parsing and extraction product, emphasizing financial documents.
Parsing accuracy Yes: Up to 99–100% zero-shot accuracy on complex documents. Partial: Solid on its core document types; narrower pipeline.
Structured extraction Yes: Deep Extract: 99.6% precision and recall on micro1's benchmark. Partial: Extraction offered, without granular per-field spatial citations.
Table extraction Yes: 0.90 on RD-TableBench; merged cells, multi-level headers, borderless tables. Yes: A stated focus, particularly for financial documents.
Enterprise readiness Yes: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, zero data retention; VPC to air-gapped. Partial: Fewer documented compliance and deployment options.
Production track record Yes: 5B+ pages processed; Harvey, Scale AI, and Vanta in production. Partial: Newer product, serving primarily small to mid-market teams.
Agent tooling Yes: MCP server, CLI, Python/Node.js/Go SDKs, and Studio. Partial: API-first; agent-native tooling is not the focus.
Pricing From $0.015/page pay-as-you-go; 15,000 free credits. $340 minimum monthly fee; volume discounts are enterprise-tier only.

Choose Reducto if…

Pulse may be a fit if…