Reducto vs Extend | Agentic Document Platform Compared

Reducto leads independent benchmark on structured extraction with Deep Extract

Helping everyone from startups to Fortune 10 enterprises unlock their data.

Featured Clients

Benchmark Comparison

Dimension Reducto Extend
Category Full platform: parse, extract, split, classify, and edit in one API. Managed document workflow product for teams not building in-house.
Extraction accuracy, measured Yes: 100% coverage, 99.6% precision and recall, 0 failures on micro1's benchmark. Partial: 93.3% coverage, 86.4% precision; 15 of 225 documents not completed.
Parsing accuracy Yes: Up to 99–100% zero-shot; handwriting, strikethroughs, redlines, charts. Partial: Solid on standard documents; less published evidence on hard content.
Table extraction Yes: 0.90 on RD-TableBench; merged cells, multi-level headers, borderless tables. Partial: Handles common tables; no published benchmark results.
Enterprise deployment Yes: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, zero data retention; hosted to air-gapped. Partial: Hosted platform only; on-prem and air-gapped not documented.
Toolkit breadth Yes: Parse, Extract, Split, Classify, and Edit across 30+ file types. Yes: Workflow builder with built-in human review; no document editing API.
Rate limits & throughput Yes: 200 concurrent batches self-serve; adaptive ceiling grows with usage. Partial: 10 RPS pay-as-you-go; enterprise starts at 75 RPS, 300 files/min.
Pricing From $0.015/page pay-as-you-go; 15,000 free credits. $300 minimum monthly fee; no pay-as-you-go tier.
Production scale 5B+ pages processed; Harvey, Scale AI, and Vanta in production. Mid-market and Fortune 500 customers; pages processed not published.

Run one of your hardest documents through Studio and compare the extraction field by field.

Open Studio Request a demo

Choose Reducto if…

Extend may be a fit if…